How to accept remaining blind in order to be happy, how to turn one's back on oneself without facing one's own negation?...
non does not restore grace to a rose by transplanting it into a pot, one denatures it; one believes one is embellishing the living room, yet in truth one does nothing but disfigure one's own garden

.
Amin, an Arab Israeli, is a brilliant surgeon, happily integrated into Tel Aviv's polite society.
After a devastating bombing of a restaurant, in which numerous civilians die, among them many children, Amin discovers that the suicide bomber is his wife, Sihem, the woman who

cradled my tenderest years, adorned my plans with glittering garlands, filled my soul with gentle presences.
I no longer find anything of her in me, nor even in my memories

.
How is it possible that his wife is a homicidal fanatic? For a few pages, the novel seems to take an intimate turn: the secrets concealed within marital relationships.
Then, the narrative reclaims a more existential and social direction.
Amin wants to know who persuaded his wife, certain that Sihem was brainwashed by someone.
He journeys to the Occupied Territories, into the midst of the war between Palestine and Israel, which he had desperately sought to escape.
As a terrorist tells him,

the good doctor lives beside a war, he just doesn't want to hear about it.
He thinks his wife shouldn't worry about it either....
Well, the good doctor is wrong

.
Amin's dreams shatter against the ruthless realization that his wife acted of her own accord, because

she must have harboured hatred within herself all along, even before knowing me.....
she carried inside her a wound so foul and atrocious that she was ashamed to confide it to me; the only way to be rid of it was to destroy herself along with it

.
Yet perhaps, far more rationally, the truth lies in what Sihem writes in her farewell letter:

what use is happiness when it is not shared.
No child is safe without a homeland

.
The journey into the Occupied Territories is also, for Amin, a return to childhood, to his people.
The narrative does not tell us whether Amin too becomes aware of his people's tragedy; we only know that he dies—accidentally or deliberately?—in a slaughter perpetrated by an Israeli drone to eliminate a religious leader.

With great narrative skill, the novel opens and closes with the slaughter in which the protagonist meets his death.
According to some critics, Amin's death, inexplicable within the plot of the story, serves as a metaphor for an endless conflict and the destruction of a people: the Palestinians.
It is an overly simplistic interpretation for a complex novel, one that refuses to take a side, neither against nor in favour of the two warring peoples.
This assessment is confirmed by the positive portrayal of certain Israeli characters, such as Amin's tender female friend, and the alternation of colloquial language with poetic and, for long stretches, sermonizing prose.
The narrative pace is tight, the dialogue dense and effective, the Israeli milieu and its characters convincingly depicted.
What jars, instead, are the political soliloquies, such as those of the religious leader and the terrorist chief, which ring false and conventional.
The Palestinian setting likewise feels artificial.
It is evident that the author feels far more at ease in an urban, Western-style environment.

Why read it? It is a gripping read.

The Attack