The book is an investigative narrative, presented through a series of interviews with immigrants.
It spans from the Eastern European prostitute to individuals who have achieved success in the economic, social, and political spheres.
What emerges is a highly variegated picture, revealing that, paradoxically, integrating and climbing the social ladder was easier for immigrants who arrived in 1970s Italy than for those who have come more recently.
In truth, immigration mirrors the deterioration of Italian society: a growing inward turn, indifference toward novelty, and thus a tendency toward an "ostrich" policy—refusing to see that Italy is changing.
There are two aspects of the book of considerable interest: the first is encapsulated in the quote cited in the book itself: "We wanted workers, but people arrived" (Max Frisch).
As the author notes, it is the cultural and ideological framework underpinning Italian legislation that is flawed:

it is still the economic utility of the migrant's labor that validates their right to live in our country

.
Or, as a Somali domestic worker puts it in other words: I am treated

essentially well, even though when I told my story I sensed a general indifference.
It is a business relationship: I provide a service and they pay me

.
In political terms, Jean-Léonard Touadi, a commissioner for the Municipality of Rome:

move beyond the logic of social assistance, stop approaching the category of immigrants, however fragile, through the lens of emergency welfare interventions.
Instead, each of us needs equal opportunities, access to culture, access to housing, easier access to credit

.
Yet aren't these the problems of Italians as well? The second aspect concerns how Italians are viewed by immigrants.
It is an intriguing perspective, revealing a somber world in which, for example, the elderly have lost much of their authority while spoiling children has become the norm, a division of roles persists between men and women, emotional life is bleak, and indifference prevails.
"There is great individual care and little, or rather none, for the collective space."

I happened to share what we eat in my country, and most of the time they looked at me with disgust

.
The art of getting by prevails, as workers are selected based on referrals from relatives and friends, and consequently

the worker is not chosen based on qualifications and professional training, but as a member of a category of peers sharing the same origin

.
The book is engaging, yet it relies too heavily on interviews with successful figures and official representatives of the immigrant community, neglecting the essential labor of digging on the ground—that is, among ordinary people.
Beneath a clean prose style and a well-constructed narrative, a journalistic weakness and an investigative fragility emerge, lending an impression of artificiality to what is recounted.

Prohibition of Residence